[Ilugc] Notes of CDs4Grab Wiki page

[Shakthi Kannan]

Hi Sridhar,

Thanks for your reply.

--- Sridhar R <sridharinfinity at gmail.com> wrote:
> You misunderstood.  I said, if suppose if A resides
> in Royapuram and B
> resides in Washermenpet, A must be listed under
> Royapuram but NOT also
> on Washermenpet.  

If A is willing to help Washermenpet residents, why
should we say no?

> The same goes for B.  Suppose if C
> also resides in
> Washermetpet, under 'Washermenpet' we have 2 entries
> - B, C. but not A
> just because that A is nearby it. 

You can specify A too if he is willing to travel to
the area and provide the service AND if B and C don't
have all the CDs or they are not in station.
 
> Now suppose under location X, A and B are listed
> according to your
> recommendation.  A is listed because he resides in
> X.  B is listed
> because X is nearby his area.  Now a person in X
> wants some CDs to be
> written.  Sure, he can approach A or B for that.  It
> is just *or*.  I
> can make some decisions like to contact the *most*
> nearby person.  But
> he is not sure.  

Let the person contact and find out. We needn't make
any assumptions, right?

The term "nearby" refers to where the maintainer can
lend his CDs to. If A wants to service locations P
(residence) and Y (work place) and if P and Y are far
away places, you are suggesting that A be assigned to
P only. But, when A is willing to service Y, why
should we say no? 

Regards,

K Shakthi


=====
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
K Shakthi
Specsoft (Hexaware Technologies), ASIC Design Center
http://www.geocities.com/shakthimaan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com