[Ilugc] Re: ILUG-Coimbatore

[விக்னேஷ் நந்த குமார]

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar <
siddhesh.poyarekar at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Anirudh Ranganath
> <anirudhrn2 at yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> > As far as naming goes, i personally vouch for ilugcbe, but if a majority
> of
> > contributors from Coimbatore want GLUG, we can review it. Valid arguments
> > for and against GNU/LINUX are given in many websites including wikipedia
> and
> > gnu's
> > website. However, i am personally neutral.
> >
>
> Just a thought -- there are many arguments (flamewars) on Linux v/s
> GNU/Linux, but I've never really found any published arguments
> (wikipedia, gnu.org, etc.) on the subject of LUG v/s GLUG. It has
> always been LUG.
>
>
Not exactly. There are a few GLUGS too [1],[2]. We can say there are more
LUGs than GLUGs.
[1] http://www.gnu.org.in/glug-meet
[2] http://www.glugot/tce.edu

Anyway I don't want to involve in any more flame war here, just shared the
info.


-- 
நன்றிகளுடன்,
விக்னேஷ்.
http://krvignesh.wordpress.com